Dr. Serkan Aygın 3500 Grafts: Age 27 Scalp + Beard Donor Result
Real patient case: This archive documents a 3,500-graft transplant for a 27-year-old patient through Serkan Aygın Clinic.
Case Summary
- Patient age: 27
- Total grafts: 3,500
- Scalp donor: 3,200 grafts
- Beard donor: 300 grafts
- Location context: the patient says procedures were carried out at Koç University Hospital
The patient’s positive impressions are preserved as personal experience, not as a guarantee of outcome.
How to Interpret This Patient Case
This page is an archived patient case rather than a controlled clinical study. Graft count, technique, timing, pricing and patient impressions should be read as historical case details only where they were recorded in the original account. Hair-transplant outcomes vary with donor density, hair calibre, recipient-area size, surgical planning, healing and the progression of future hair loss.
When comparing this case with another result, look at the starting hair-loss pattern, donor appearance, lighting, hair length and the exact follow-up point. Early postoperative photographs mainly document placement and healing, while later photographs are more useful for judging cosmetic growth.
Useful Points to Compare
- Starting hair-loss pattern and donor density
- Reported graft count and recipient-area coverage
- Donor extraction pattern and visible thinning
- Hairline design, direction and density distribution
- Time elapsed between surgery and each photograph
The patient was 27 years old and reported a total of 3,500 grafts: approximately 3,200 from the scalp donor area and 300 from the beard. The patient also stated that the procedure took place in the context of Koç University Hospital.
Why the Beard Donor Detail Is Important
Using beard grafts can supplement scalp donor supply in selected cases, but beard and scalp hair differ in calibre and growth characteristics. This means the placement strategy and the reason for using a secondary donor source are important parts of interpreting the case.
The patient’s comments about the clinic being professional are preserved as personal experience rather than an independent quality rating. The meaningful cosmetic outcome would need to be judged from later follow-up, not from the immediate postoperative stage.
